Rightsizing Your SaaS Stack: A Strategic Approach to Eliminating Waste
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room, most organisations are paying for far more SaaS than they actually need. The average enterprise wastes between 15-30% of their software budget on unused or underutilised applications, duplicate functionality, and overpriced contracts. This isn’t just inefficient; it’s a massive drain on resources that could be directed toward innovation and growth.
Table of Contents
How Did We Get Here?
The path to SaaS bloat rarely happens overnight. Instead, it’s the culmination of hundreds of well-intentioned decisions made across the organisation:
- Department heads selecting tools without visibility into what exists elsewhere
- Teams maintaining legacy applications while simultaneously adopting new ones
- Automatic renewals that perpetuate outdated purchasing decisions
- Overprovisioning “just in case” needs change
- Free trials that convert to paid subscriptions and then never get reviewed
The result is a tangled mess of applications, some critical to daily operations, others barely touched since implementation. The challenge is determining which is which.
Beyond Basic Cost-Cutting
Rightsizing your SaaS portfolio isn’t just about slashing spending. It’s about creating an optimised application ecosystem that delivers genuine value. This requires a more nuanced approach than simply eliminating the most expensive contracts.
A truly strategic rightsizing effort considers:
Business impact vs expenditure Not all applications with low usage are candidates for elimination. Some tools might be used infrequently but deliver enormous value when needed (think specialised analysis software used for quarterly reporting). The key is understanding the relationship between cost and business impact.
Feature overlap and consolidation opportunities Many organisations unknowingly pay for the same capabilities multiple times over. Marketing might use one project management tool while Product uses another—each with 80% feature overlap. Identifying these redundancies often reveals immediate consolidation opportunities.
Licence optimisation Even for essential applications, most organisations maintain inappropriate licence levels. Perhaps you’re paying for enterprise features that go unused, or maintaining the same number of licences despite team reductions. Rightsizing often means keeping the application but adjusting the scale.
Contract restructuring Beyond reducing licence counts, substantial savings come from restructuring contracts to align with actual usage patterns. This might mean shifting from user-based to consumption-based pricing for some services, or negotiating custom terms that reflect your unique needs.
A Framework for Rightsizing
Moving from theory to practice requires a methodical approach:
1. Discovery and visibility
Before making cuts, gain complete visibility into your current landscape. This means cataloguing:
- All active subscriptions and their costs
- Renewal dates and terms
- Usage metrics across departments
- Stakeholders for each application
2. Utilisation analysis
With your inventory established, assess how each application is actually being used:
- Login frequency and user engagement
- Feature adoption rates
- Abandoned or rarely accessed functionality
- Departmental variation in usage
3. Value mapping
Not all usage equates to value. The critical step is mapping utilisation to business outcomes:
- Which applications directly support revenue generation?
- Which improves operational efficiency?
- Which serves compliance or security functions?
- Which primarily enhances employee experience?
4. Optimisation strategy
With a clear picture of your portfolio, develop tailored strategies for different categories:
- Mission-critical applications: Optimise licence counts and negotiate better terms
- Valuable but overlapping tools: Consolidate to best-in-class options
- Underutilised applications: Implement user training or phase out entirely
- Legacy systems: Develop migration timelines to modern alternatives
The Expert Advantage
While the framework above can guide internal efforts, many organisations find that working with specialists yields superior results. Platforms like Vertice combine technology-driven discovery with procurement expertise to drive more substantial optimisation.
The differentiator is often market intelligence, knowing exactly what comparable organisations pay for the same services and which contract terms are truly negotiable. This benchmarked data transforms conversations with vendors from confrontational to collaborative, focusing on right-fitting rather than simple discounting.
Beyond One-Time Savings
The most significant benefit of a strategic rightsizing initiative isn’t the immediate cost reduction, though that’s certainly welcome. It’s establishing governance that prevents future bloat through:
- Centralised visibility and approval workflows
- Regular utilisation reviews
- Proactive renewal management
- Vendor consolidation strategies
By transforming SaaS management from reactive to strategic, organisations not only eliminate current waste but ensure their technology investments continue delivering maximum value as needs evolve.
In today’s economic climate, having a lean, purpose-built SaaS portfolio isn’t just good financial hygiene, it’s a competitive advantage that frees resources for the innovations that truly move the business forward.
